Pragmatists believe in a broad and diversified curriculum. They endorse a more general education as opposed to narrow specialization. Pragmatic curriculum is composed of both process and content. When we consider what a child learns as fixed and ready made, attention is directed too much upon outcome and too
And so, they press back. I live in a large suburban area (Orange County, California), and most of the people I know that oppose gay marriage are–in my estimation–persuadable. But when the change is from someone whose first instincts are to label them as a fascist, a homophobe, or a hick: it’s pure human nature to react “Fuck you! I’m standing pat.”
little upon process. Pragmatists focus some attention on process, because ends should not be divorced from means. So they assert that the means. used to accomplish something dictate what the actual ends and outcomes really are.
In the arena of gay rights, especially, the biggest part of the problem is that the opponents don’t understand you. They feel frightened and threatened, and think that their universe is going to change. Many don’t know a gay person (or, at least, don’t know that they know one.) Best way to show them that they’re fearing a boogie man? Show them how boring gay couples can actually be.
and over 50,000 other term papers
Continuous, gentle pressure will get you where you want to go. There is no “powers that be”–that is a rhetorical construct. What there is, is people.
from reading his work that he has a strong dislike towards religious
Happily, advocating for OEP avoids the problem of inadvertently striking a judgmental tone when describing non-OER users () because discussions about innovation are not driven by guilt or avoidance. Rather, OEP articulates a vision of education that is aspirational and driven by an approach motivation. Within this broader vision, significant cost savings to students are the least significant benefit of OER.
You don’t think a large part of Martin Luther King’s job was cooling down the radical factions who wanted to see faster progress–the Malcolm Xs, and the Stokely Carmichaels? Do you think that if the civil rights movement had started out by throwing rocks they would have made the progress that they did?
Write better papers. Get better grades.
If I recall correctly, I believe James Gosling, the creator of Java, noted that he looked at up to 10 different ways to test for “equality”, each of which is useful in a specific context. I believe it was in the C/C++ Journal that I read, in a discussion on overriding the equality operator, that there are 26 different notions of equality. Scheme has three different functions for testing equality: EQ, EQL, and EQUAL, each of which can yield different results for lists that have sublists as members.