Photo provided by Flickr
This does not mean that the witness of 1 Corinthians 13 is equivalent to the witness of the Maroon Bells near Aspen, Colorado. The Bible speaks to us in language, teaching us directly. God's Creation inspires awe in us at the works of the Creator who made it all and sustains it in the present time. The Bible is the greater witness. Creation does not contradict it.
Does anyone really think that every living creature has these lines of code inside its reproductive system? Does anyone claim that there is really a cosmic random number generator? My professional experience in simulation leads me to conclude that "random chance" means "I don't know how this works," or "I do know but it's too complicated to model." One could use physics equations to model the throw of a pair of dice on a craps table, but it would be extremely difficult. Random number generators reproduce the expected results, not the process. We use simulation and random number generators to reproduce the statistical results over thousands of trials. The term "random chance" has been used to imply some sort of Godless, causeless wandering. But in reality "random chance" is a statistician's technique for modeling processes that are beyond our comprehension. It is a valid technique, but it has no theological implications, except the ones stated so vividly in Job 38-41.
The Bible cannot be wrong, but it can be interpreted wrongly. Creation cannot be wrong, as expressed in Psalm 19: "The heavens are telling the glory of God; and the firmament displays His handiwork." Fallible humans can interpret creation wrongly. Many creationists would like us to forget that both areas of interpretation can be wrong, not just the mainstream interpretation of the earth. I believe that correct and reasonable interpretations of the Bible and Creation will and must converge on God's Truth. Interpretations of the Bible that lead us to assign most of geology to the single year of Noah's Flood are neither correct nor reasonable.
Photo provided by Flickr
The existence of God is not a matter that can easily be discerned by an individual but one fact stand out. The question of His existence already certifies the idea or belief that he exists. As logical beings, the mental capability cannot bring into existence an aspect that is not within the domain of man’s perception according to William. This presents the argument that, to question God’s existence is already a step forward in acknowledging His existence. On divine matters, the mind is incapable of conceiving non-existing objects. As logical and rational beings, it becomes apparent that thinking is only possible within the aspects of creation. Doubt in God’s existence arises out of the need to understand Him further and open up to his mystery. Failure to comprehend on his existence and to the understanding the mystery that surround this concept is what brings out the doubt. However, as argued by Pascal, rational thought or intelligence cannot make it up whether God exists or not. The notion and concept go beyond ordinary reasoning or away from man’s scope of knowledge. In essence, he alludes that it is more sensible to go for an option that best suits one’s thinking and understanding. Whatever choice one goes for, all depends on what he or she has given priority or focus.
God in the Dock: Essays on Theology and Ethics [C
In Genesis 2: 4 seems to refer to the entire creation week: "These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day () that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens." It's also puzzling to imagine Day 1 as an ordinary day. God said "Let there be light!" and there was light. There was not yet any sun or moon to mark the days. He divided the light from the darkness and began to create order out of chaos. The first day of the universe was anything but an ordinary day. According to Job 38:7, all the angels shouted for joy. It was such a glorious time! Certainly God Almighty can do all that in 24 hours, but what reason is there to limit this wonderful act of creation to 24 hours? What purpose does it serve to insist that it must be exactly 24 modern hours long?
Custom Analysis of the movie “City of God” essay writing
But upon looking in, I was aghast. Those were the days of the “Dutch Catechism,” and the clown masses, and the socialist priests (remember them?) — of obvious heresies and intentional vileness. I couldn’t believe the “Catholic Church” retained any standing, with God or anyone else; it had so obviously gone to the dogs. Whereas, the higher Anglicans still had smells and bells. And beautiful music, and tasteful decorations. So far as I was unconsciously church-scouting, they had already moved to the top of my list.
Pascal and William’s philosophy resonates well with attempts to analyze and understand faith in God but casts a dark cloud on the true existence of God. Although they do not address the issue directly, opting to focus on one’s belief, the core hypothesis can be analyzed from the ideology that God does not exist. This is fronted by the fact that, there is no universal single belief that unites all humanity on the understanding of the reality of God. The existence of a clear-cut knowledge of God universally could do better in clearing the air on His existence. Lack of this universally accepted knowledge is what gives rise to several ideologies concerning God’s reality (Nagasawa, 2011).
Photo provided by Flickr
BELIEVING IN GOD | Accurate Essays
I like the idea expressed in Genesis 1:30 of God's providence for all creatures. I also like the idea of the Peaceable Kingdom, where the lion lies down with the lamb and there is no violence. We don't have a clear indication of when the carnivorous animals switched to eating meat, because Genesis 9:3 refers only to mankind. Job 39:27-30 could indicate that eagles were created as carnivorous animals, but it's not clear enough by itself. I have looked at the sharp teeth of a Tyrannosaurus rex, and they don't look like something created by an to chew vegetation. Since I understand the references to death in Romans 5:12 to mean spiritual death, the presence of carnivorous animals does not pose a theological problem. This issue is not essential for salvation. I simply don't know how Genesis 1:30 fits in with what I can observe about animals. When taken with verse 29, the two verses could be merely a description of who gets to eat what kind of vegetation (man - seeds and fruit, animals and birds - grasses and plants). I do know that verse 30 occurs in a section that describes God's providence for all creatures, and that is the faith message I can take from it.
Free Essays on Poseidon - Dangerous God of the SeaLet the Earth Bring Forth.
The phrase "let the earth bring forth..." occurs three times in Genesis 1 (verses 11, 20 with water, 24). It does not refer to simple growth from nutrients, because this chapter is about creation. The literal meaning of this phrase matches theistic evolution better than any other creation theory! It's almost a definition of theistic evolution, which is why I put it at the top of this essay. God commanded the earth to produce animals, and the planet did so according to His command.