Feel free to comment on others’ posts. Remember, you are to engage someone (in real life!) in Rogerian Argument this week, and this forum is where you share those results.
Beginning with Maxine Hairston's seminal article (1976), a number ofwriters have recommended Rogerian rhetoric as an alternative form ofargumentto be used, as Young, Becker and Pike originally recommended, whenemotionsand a sense of threat preclude direct debate in the classical mode(Bator1980, 1992; Coe, 1992).
Lunsford and Ede (1984), Gage (this volume) and others have arguedthatthose who view classical rhetoric as inherently combative have beenmisledboth by later misreadings of Aristotle and his contemporaries and by anincomplete understanding of the role of the enthymeme. They argue thatthe enthymeme, the heart of Aristotle's structure of argumentation,differsfrom the logical syllogism precisely in that it involves the rhetor inthe building an argument from the opinions of the audience. Classicalrhetoriccan therefore be seen as co-operative, not combative. This in fact isthebasis for Lunsford's argument that a Rogerian "alternative" totraditionalrhetoric is unnecessary (1979).
But what about the instances--far more common in everyday life--inwhichtwo parties are directly trying to convince each other? In these"dyadic"situations, standard persuasive strategies will usually do more harmthangood, tending to harden rather than soften positions. In such cases ofdyadic argument, a technique is required that will create the groundsforreasonable discussion that classical rhetoric presupposes. Rogerianrhetoricoffers such a technique (Coe 1992).
Rogerian Argument-Gun Control Essay - Paper Topics
Although they argue that it should not be reduced to a mechanicalformula,Young, Becker and Pike outline four basic stages through which aRogerianargument should pass:
In writing your outline for your Rogerian argument essay, ..
Your argumentative essay allows you to take a position on an issue and present support for your position following the Rogerian argument pattern.
I believe that some of these problems stem from a failure torecognizejust what Rogerian rhetoric really is. The basic model of Rogerianargument,particularly when abstracted from the rich context of heuristictechniquesin which Young, Becker and Pike originally embedded it, looks like aformof arrangement: a recipe for what to say first. But arrangement is onlypart of the business of any rhetorical system. Logically prior toarrangement--andas I will argue, embedded in the process of arrangement, not separatefromit--is the process of invention. In Rogerian terms, this meansexploringan opposing point of view in sufficiently rich complexity that it ispossibleto reflect it back convincingly to an audience.
Custom Rogerian Argument Proposed Outline essay …
You are required to have 8-10 different electronic journal sources (I am supplying these). No books, websites, or other print sources will be allowed. Many argument essay models (the Toulmin and Classical Models of argument) focus more on proving the validity of one position??"the standard form of debate with a “winner” and a “loser,” however, the Rogerian Argument focuses on consensus and common ground??"the validity of both sides. It is the Rogerian Argument that allows for negotiation and problem solving, especially with hotly contested issues.